Dr. King and the cause of life

By January 20, 2019October 2nd, 2019A Note from PJ

Dr. King and the cause of life

In 1983, President Ronald Reagan signed the King Holiday Act, proclaiming the third Monday in January as Martin Luther King Jr. Day. The next year, he proclaimed the third Sunday in January as National Sanctity of Human Life Day.

As a result, today and tomorrow we commemorate these two events.  We might ask, “What would Dr. King say about abortion and the cause of life?

Planned Parenthood gave Dr. King its Margaret Sanger Award in 1966. However, at that time the organization was still publishing a pamphlet that stated, “Is birth control abortion? Definitely not. An abortion kills the life of a baby after it has begun. It is dangerous to your life and health.” The organization supported birth control but opposed abortion and changed its stance in the latter years after Dr. King was assassinated.

According to his niece, Dr. Alveda King, her uncle “was pro-life, pro-abstinence before marriage, and based his views on the unchanging Word of God.” Dr. King was assassinated five years before the Supreme Court legalized abortion. Were he alive today, I wonder what he would say about the sanctity of life, in his own words?

Dr. Jim Denison wrote an article on this topic and notes how, in accepting the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize, Dr. King stated, “Civilization and violence are antithetical concepts.” Would he extend his logic to violence against the unborn?

In his “Letter from a Birmingham City Jail,” Dr. King asserted that, “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Would he include injustice against the unborn and against mothers pressured to abort their children? As NPR commentator Frederica Mathewes-Green notes, “Abortion is not a sign that women are free, but a sign that they are desperate.”

Here are questions posed by Denison in his article…

In “The American Dream,” Dr. King stated, “We must keep our moral and spiritual progress abreast with our scientific and technological advances.” What would he say about abortion-causing drugs now available without parental consent?

Delivering the commencement address for Oberlin College, Dr. King warned: “It may well be that we will have to repent in this generation. Not merely for the vitriolic words and violent actions of bad people, but for the appalling silence and indifference of the good people who sit around and say, ‘Wait on time.'” What would he say to those who know life begins at conception but do not use their influence to defend the unborn?

According to Dr. King, “Cowardice asks the question, ‘Is it safe?’; expediency asks the question, ‘Is it politic?’; vanity asks the question, ‘Is it popular?’; but conscience asks the question, ‘Is it right?’; and there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor politic, nor popular, but because conscience tells one it is right.” Would he not commend those who defend life graciously but courageously?

Let us heed Dr. King’s wisdom as we stand for the sanctity of all people of all races, from the moment of their conception, to the glory of God.—